How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Which cognitive biases caused American Apparel's collapse?

5 bias patterns are documented in this case, led by Status Quo Bias. The full set: Status Quo Bias, Authority Bias, Loss Aversion, Sunk Cost Fallacy, Anchoring Bias. Each is mapped to Decision Intel's 22-bias R²F taxonomy with stable IDs and academic citations.

What is Decision Intel's reasoning audit?

Decision Intel runs a 12-node Recognition-Rigor Framework (R²F) pipeline on strategic memos, detecting cognitive biases from a 22-bias canonical taxonomy and producing a Decision Quality Index (DQI) score. The audit produces a hashed, tamper-evident Decision Provenance Record (DPR) suitable for audit-committee review.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureRetail2015

American Apparel

American Apparel Collapse

Estimated impact: $600M+ in debt; brand sold for $88M

F14

Decision Quality Index (simulated)

Critical · 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

American Apparel filed for bankruptcy twice (2015, 2016) after founder Dov Charney's controversial leadership, excessive vertical integration costs, and failure to evolve beyond a single brand identity. The company's "Made in USA" LA manufacturing was 3x the cost of offshore alternatives.

Decision context

Whether to maintain premium domestic manufacturing and a single-brand retail strategy as fast fashion competitors offered similar aesthetics at a fraction of the price.

Decision anatomy

Monetary stakes

High

Dissent suppressed

Yes

Time pressure

None

Unanimous consensus

Yes

Decision participants

Dissent encouraged

External advisors

Iterative process

Red = risk factor present · Green = protective factor present

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★Status Quo Bias

critical

Authority Bias

high

Loss Aversion

medium

Sunk Cost Fallacy

high

Anchoring Bias

high

★ Primary driver · Severity estimated from bias type and decision outcome

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

American Apparel · 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

!Status Quo Lock

Loss aversion combined with status quo bias makes even clearly beneficial change feel impossible.

!Sunk Ship

Commitment to a failing course escalates to justify sunk costs, even as evidence mounts.

Reference class base rates

Across all 143 curated case studies in our library:

89%

base failure rate

-0%

partial / mixed

11%

base success rate

■ Failure■ Partial■ Success

Lessons learned

Status quo bias around domestic manufacturing as brand identity prevented the cost rationalization needed to survive
Authority bias around a controversial founder prevented the board from acting on governance failures until too late
Sunk cost in vertical integration (factories, retail stores) made pivoting to a capital-light model impossible

Source: American Apparel Chapter 11 filing (2015); Bloomberg investigation (SEC Filing)

Pilot slots available

We caught these patterns in American Apparel's own record — before the outcome.

See the full bias auditwe ran — no login, no card. Then run the same 60-second audit on your own next memo.

See a live audit · no login Audit your own memo

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Audit your own decision

Workflows that fire on decisions like American Apparel’s

The same Recognition-Rigor Framework that documents this case audits memos in the same shape — before the outcome forces the lesson.

For CSOs and Heads of Strategic Planning

Strategic memo audit

Audit a strategic memo for cognitive bias and forecast errors in 60 seconds — before the board sees it.

Audit a strategic memo

For any high-stakes decision, before commitment

Decision pre-mortem

Run a structured pre-mortem before the decision is final — surface failure modes the room cannot see from the inside.

Run a pre-mortem

For CSOs and CEOs presenting to a board

Board deck pre-presentation audit

Audit a board deck before the presentation — predict the toughest questions the room will ask.

Audit your board deck

See all 6 workflows for the full audit-tool surface.

Related cases in Retail

Catastrophic failure2005

Sears

Sears Refuses E-Commerce Transformation

Catastrophic failure1975

Eastman Kodak

Kodak Digital Camera Decision

Exceptional success2014

Microsoft

Microsoft Satya Nadella Cloud Transformation

Success2000

Target

Target Design-Led Retail Differentiation

Lessons learned

Status quo bias around domestic manufacturing as brand identity prevented the cost rationalization needed to survive

Authority bias around a controversial founder prevented the board from acting on governance failures until too late

Sunk cost in vertical integration (factories, retail stores) made pivoting to a capital-light model impossible