How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

FailureTechnology2015

IBM

IBM Watson Health Strategic Failure

Estimated impact: $5B

F30

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

IBM invested over $5 billion acquiring companies and building Watson Health, promising AI-driven healthcare transformation. The technology consistently failed to deliver on marketing claims, with oncology recommendations sometimes being unsafe. IBM sold the division for approximately $1 billion in 2022.

Decision context

Whether to continue investing billions in Watson Health's AI-driven oncology and healthcare analytics products despite repeated failures to match clinical accuracy claims in real-world settings.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★ Overconfidence BiasPlanning FallacyConfirmation BiasSunk Cost FallacyAnchoring Bias

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

IBM — 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Optimism Trap
Sunk Ship

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Marketing AI capabilities before the technology can reliably deliver creates a credibility gap that erodes customer trust.
Planning fallacy in AI healthcare deployments consistently underestimates the difficulty of working with messy, unstructured clinical data.
Confirmation bias led IBM to showcase cherry-picked success stories while ignoring systemic accuracy failures.

Source: Casey Ross and Ike Swetlitz, "IBM's Watson Supercomputer Recommended Unsafe and Incorrect Cancer Treatments" (STAT News, 2018) (News Investigation)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for IBM, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Technology

Catastrophic failure1975

Eastman Kodak

Kodak Digital Camera Decision

Catastrophic failure2007

Nokia

Nokia Smartphone Market Collapse

Catastrophic failure2000

Blockbuster

Blockbuster Rejection of Netflix Partnership

Lessons learned

Marketing AI capabilities before the technology can reliably deliver creates a credibility gap that erodes customer trust.

Planning fallacy in AI healthcare deployments consistently underestimates the difficulty of working with messy, unstructured clinical data.

Confirmation bias led IBM to showcase cherry-picked success stories while ignoring systemic accuracy failures.