How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

FailureHealthcare1970

Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson Talc Powder Litigation

Estimated impact: $3.9B

F33

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 1 toxic combinations

J&J faced tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging its talcum powder products contained asbestos and caused ovarian cancer. Internal documents revealed the company was aware of potential contamination as early as the 1970s but chose to maintain the product line rather than switch to corn starch alternatives.

Decision context

Whether to reformulate or discontinue talc-based baby powder products after internal testing detected trace asbestos contamination and epidemiological studies suggested cancer risk.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★ Status Quo BiasConfirmation BiasLoss AversionSelective PerceptionCognitive Misering

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Johnson & Johnson — 5 biases, 1 toxic combination

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Status Quo Lock

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Status quo bias in legacy product lines can persist for decades when reformulation costs seem to outweigh uncertain litigation risk.
Confirmation bias in internal safety reviews leads to dismissing unfavorable findings rather than acting on precautionary principles.
Loss aversion around an iconic product brand can override scientific evidence and basic consumer safety obligations.

Source: Reuters investigation, "Johnson & Johnson Knew for Decades that Asbestos Lurked in Its Baby Powder" (2018) (News Investigation)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for Johnson & Johnson, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Healthcare

Catastrophic failure2004

Merck

Vioxx Withdrawal

Catastrophic failure1996

Purdue Pharma

Purdue Pharma OxyContin Marketing

Catastrophic failure2014

Theranos

Theranos Blood Testing Patient Safety Failures

Lessons learned

Status quo bias in legacy product lines can persist for decades when reformulation costs seem to outweigh uncertain litigation risk.

Confirmation bias in internal safety reviews leads to dismissing unfavorable findings rather than acting on precautionary principles.

Loss aversion around an iconic product brand can override scientific evidence and basic consumer safety obligations.