How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureHealthcare2014

Theranos

Theranos Blood Testing Patient Safety Failures

Estimated impact: $9B valuation destroyed; patient safety compromised

F12

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 6 biases detected, 3 toxic combinations

Theranos deployed its unreliable Edison blood testing devices in Walgreens stores, delivering inaccurate results to real patients. Patients received false positives and negatives for conditions including cancer and HIV, leading to unnecessary treatments, emotional distress, and delayed diagnoses for serious conditions.

Decision context

Whether to deploy blood testing devices in retail pharmacies for patient use before the technology had been validated through proper clinical trials and regulatory review.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★ Authority BiasConfirmation BiasGroupthinkOverconfidence BiasPlanning FallacyHalo Effect

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Theranos — 6 biases, 3 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 6 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Yes Committee
Echo Chamber
Golden Child

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Authority bias led Walgreens to trust Theranos's claims and deploy unvalidated medical devices in their pharmacies.
Confirmation bias caused Theranos to cherry-pick quality control results and dismiss failed test runs.
Patient safety must never be subordinated to commercial launch timelines, regardless of investor pressure.

Source: FDA Warning Letter to Theranos Inc. (2015); CMS Inspection Report (2016); John Carreyrou, "Bad Blood" (2018) (FDA Action)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for Theranos, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Healthcare

Catastrophic failure2004

Merck

Vioxx Withdrawal

Catastrophic failure1996

Purdue Pharma

Purdue Pharma OxyContin Marketing

Failure1970

Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson Talc Powder Litigation

Lessons learned

Authority bias led Walgreens to trust Theranos's claims and deploy unvalidated medical devices in their pharmacies.

Confirmation bias caused Theranos to cherry-pick quality control results and dismiss failed test runs.

Patient safety must never be subordinated to commercial launch timelines, regardless of investor pressure.