How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureHealthcare2015

Theranos

Theranos Blood Testing Fraud

Estimated impact: $9B valuation to zero; potential patient harm from inaccurate results

F14

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

Elizabeth Holmes founded Theranos claiming its Edison device could run hundreds of blood tests from a single finger prick. The technology never worked as claimed — most tests were run on modified commercial machines. A Wall Street Journal investigation by John Carreyrou in 2015 exposed the fraud. The company's $9 billion valuation went to zero. Holmes was convicted of four counts of wire fraud in 2022.

Decision context

Whether investors, board members, and retail pharmacy partners (Walgreens) should have demanded independent validation of Theranos's core technology claims before committing billions in capital and customer trust.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★ Authority BiasHalo EffectGroupthinkConfirmation BiasOverconfidence Bias

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Theranos — 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Echo Chamber
Optimism Trap

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

A board stacked with political luminaries (Kissinger, Shultz, Mattis) but zero medical device experts created the ultimate authority bias — credibility without competence.
Walgreens invested $140 million without ever independently validating the core technology, relying instead on Holmes's reputation and board prestige.
When employees raised concerns, they were silenced with NDAs and threats — dissent suppression is the strongest predictor of catastrophic fraud.

Source: John Carreyrou, "Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup" (2018); U.S. v. Holmes, N.D. Cal. No. 18-cr-00258; SEC v. Theranos Inc. and Elizabeth A. Holmes (2018) (News Investigation)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for Theranos, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Healthcare

Catastrophic failure2004

Merck

Vioxx Withdrawal

Catastrophic failure1996

Purdue Pharma

Purdue Pharma OxyContin Marketing

Failure1970

Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson Talc Powder Litigation

Lessons learned

A board stacked with political luminaries (Kissinger, Shultz, Mattis) but zero medical device experts created the ultimate authority bias — credibility without competence.

Walgreens invested $140 million without ever independently validating the core technology, relying instead on Holmes's reputation and board prestige.

When employees raised concerns, they were silenced with NDAs and threats — dissent suppression is the strongest predictor of catastrophic fraud.