How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Which cognitive biases caused LEGO's exceptional outcome?

4 bias patterns are documented in this case, led by Sunk Cost Fallacy. The full set: Sunk Cost Fallacy, Status Quo Bias, Anchoring Bias, Loss Aversion. Each is mapped to Decision Intel's 22-bias R²F taxonomy with stable IDs and academic citations.

What is Decision Intel's reasoning audit?

Decision Intel runs a 12-node Recognition-Rigor Framework (R²F) pipeline on strategic memos, detecting cognitive biases from a 22-bias canonical taxonomy and producing a Decision Quality Index (DQI) score. The audit produces a hashed, tamper-evident Decision Provenance Record (DPR) suitable for audit-committee review.

All case studies

Exceptional successManufacturing2004

LEGO

LEGO Near-Bankruptcy Turnaround

Estimated impact: Revenue grew from $1.1B (2004) to $5.8B (2019); became world's largest toy company

A88

Decision Quality Index (simulated)

Excellent · 4 biases detected

By 2003, LEGO was losing $1 million per day and approaching bankruptcy after a decade of unfocused diversification into theme parks, clothing lines, and video games. New CEO Jørgen Vig Knudstorp (promoted from within at age 35) made the radical decision to return to the core brick, selling off theme parks, cutting 1/3 of products, and rebuilding around what LEGO uniquely did well. By 2015, LEGO had overtaken Mattel as the world's largest toy company.

Decision context

Whether to continue the diversification strategy that had been pursued for a decade or radically refocus on the core brick product, divesting theme parks, clothing, and other extensions.

Decision anatomy

Monetary stakes

Very high

Dissent suppressed

Time pressure

Present

Unanimous consensus

Decision participants

Dissent encouraged

Yes

External advisors

Yes

Iterative process

Yes

Red = risk factor present · Green = protective factor present

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★Sunk Cost Fallacy

critical

Status Quo Bias

medium

Anchoring Bias

high

Loss Aversion

medium

★ Primary driver · Severity estimated from bias type and decision outcome

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

LEGO · 4 biases

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 4 detected biases

Reference class base rates

Across all 143 curated case studies in our library:

89%

base failure rate

-0%

partial / mixed

11%

base success rate

■ Failure■ Partial■ Success

Lessons learned

Sunk cost fallacy in the diversification investments was overcome by framing divestitures as "unlocking capital" rather than "admitting failure."
A CEO without personal investment in the failing strategy was essential — internal promotion of a younger leader bypassed the emotional attachment of the executive team.
Engaging the fan community (external advisors) provided unfiltered feedback that confirmed the core product was still beloved — the strategy, not the brand, was the problem.

Source: David C. Robertson, "Brick by Brick: How LEGO Rewrote the Rules of Innovation" (2013); LEGO Group annual reports (2004-2015); Knudstorp interview, Harvard Business Review (2009) (Case Study)

Pilot slots available

We caught these patterns in LEGO's own record — before the outcome.

See the full bias auditwe ran — no login, no card. Then run the same 60-second audit on your own next memo.

See a live audit · no login Audit your own memo

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Audit your own decision

Workflows that fire on decisions like LEGO’s

The same Recognition-Rigor Framework that documents this case audits memos in the same shape — before the outcome forces the lesson.

For CSOs and Heads of Strategic Planning

Strategic memo audit

Audit a strategic memo for cognitive bias and forecast errors in 60 seconds — before the board sees it.

Audit a strategic memo

For any high-stakes decision, before commitment

Decision pre-mortem

Run a structured pre-mortem before the decision is final — surface failure modes the room cannot see from the inside.

Run a pre-mortem

For CSOs and CEOs presenting to a board

Board deck pre-presentation audit

Audit a board deck before the presentation — predict the toughest questions the room will ask.

Audit your board deck

See all 6 workflows for the full audit-tool surface.

Related cases in Manufacturing

Catastrophic failure2017

Toys "R" Us

Toys "R" Us Bankruptcy

Catastrophic failure2004

U.S. Army / Boeing / Sikorsky

RAH-66 Comanche Helicopter Cancellation

Catastrophic failure2005

Toys R Us

Toys R Us Leveraged Buyout Failure

Catastrophic failure2013

Microsoft

Microsoft-Nokia Mobile Division Acquisition

Lessons learned

Sunk cost fallacy in the diversification investments was overcome by framing divestitures as "unlocking capital" rather than "admitting failure."

A CEO without personal investment in the failing strategy was essential — internal promotion of a younger leader bypassed the emotional attachment of the executive team.

Engaging the fan community (external advisors) provided unfiltered feedback that confirmed the core product was still beloved — the strategy, not the brand, was the problem.