How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Which cognitive biases caused MF Global's collapse?

5 bias patterns are documented in this case, led by Overconfidence Bias. The full set: Overconfidence Bias, Anchoring Bias, Authority Bias, Groupthink, Sunk Cost Fallacy. Each is mapped to Decision Intel's 22-bias R²F taxonomy with stable IDs and academic citations.

What is Decision Intel's reasoning audit?

Decision Intel runs a 12-node Recognition-Rigor Framework (R²F) pipeline on strategic memos, detecting cognitive biases from a 22-bias canonical taxonomy and producing a Decision Quality Index (DQI) score. The audit produces a hashed, tamper-evident Decision Provenance Record (DPR) suitable for audit-committee review.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureFinancial Services2011

MF Global

MF Global Bankruptcy

Estimated impact: $1.6B

F14

Decision Quality Index (simulated)

Critical · 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

Under CEO Jon Corzine's leadership, MF Global made a $6.3 billion bet on European sovereign debt using repo-to-maturity transactions. When European debt prices fell, margin calls drained the firm's liquidity, and $1.6 billion in customer funds were improperly used to meet obligations.

Decision context

Whether to approve CEO Corzine's strategy of leveraged bets on European sovereign bonds as a path to transforming MF Global from a brokerage into an investment bank.

Decision anatomy

Monetary stakes

Very high

Dissent suppressed

Yes

Time pressure

Present

Unanimous consensus

Decision participants

Dissent encouraged

External advisors

Iterative process

Red = risk factor present · Green = protective factor present

Decision Intel Platform Analysis

Source: Board Memo · 2011-06

The analysis below was produced from the pre-decision document only. No hindsight. This is what the platform would have surfaced if it had been running in 2011-06.

Board Memo · 2011-06

“MF Global's Q3 FY2011 board materials documented a $6.3B gross exposure to European sovereign debt (Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Belgium) through repo-to-maturity transactions. The structure was disclosed as 'off-balance-sheet' despite carrying full market risk. CEO Jon Corzine personally directed the trades, overruling Chief Risk Officer Michael Roseman's objections — Roseman was replaced in January 2011 after refusing to approve increased sovereign exposure. CFO Henri Steenkamp's balance sheet reports understated the true liquidity risk of the RTM structure.”

Source: SIPA Trustee's Report on MF Global (2013); CFTC v. MF Global Inc. complaint; House Financial Services Committee testimony

Red flags detectable at decision time

Chief Risk Officer (Roseman) removed in Jan 2011 after objecting to sovereign exposure — replaced by successor more receptive to CEO strategy
Repo-to-maturity structure reported as off-balance-sheet while carrying full market risk
CEO Corzine's personal direction of proprietary trades from executive office — blurring line between CEO and trader roles
Initial board approvals set limit at $1B — breached multiple times before limit was raised retroactively to $4.75B, then $5B
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) raised concerns about capital treatment of the RTM positions in summer 2011

Cognitive biases the platform would have flagged

Overconfidence BiasAuthority BiasSunk Cost FallacyGambler's Fallacy

Hypothetical analysis

DI would flag Corzine's removal of the CRO as the single most diagnostic event. A decision process where the CEO replaces the risk officer who challenges him — and the board allows it — is structurally incapable of circuit-breaking. The retroactive limit raises (rather than forced unwinds) is the signature of gambler's fallacy: each loss cycle produces a 'we're closer to the reversal' rationalization rather than a mandatory trim. The $1.6B customer-fund shortfall that ended the firm was the final-stage expression of a decision process that had already ceased functioning.

Biases present in the decision

★Overconfidence Bias

critical

Anchoring Bias

high

Authority Bias

high

Groupthink

high

Sunk Cost Fallacy

high

★ Primary driver · Severity estimated from bias type and decision outcome

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

MF Global · 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

!Yes Committee

Authority bias meets groupthink: the group converges on whatever leadership signals it wants.

!Sunk Ship

Commitment to a failing course escalates to justify sunk costs, even as evidence mounts.

Reference class base rates

Across all 143 curated case studies in our library:

89%

base failure rate

-0%

partial / mixed

11%

base success rate

■ Failure■ Partial■ Success

Lessons learned

A CEO's prior political stature and reputation can create authority bias that suppresses board-level risk oversight.
Concentrated directional bets funded by customer money violate the fundamental trust of brokerage operations.
Anchoring to past success in government bond markets ignores the different risk profile of sovereign credit exposure.

Source: CFTC v. MF Global Inc. complaint; SIPA Trustee's Report on MF Global (2013) (SEC Filing)

Pilot slots available

We caught these patterns in MF Global's own record — before the outcome.

See the full hindsight-stripped auditwe ran — no login, no card. Then run the same 60-second audit on your own next memo.

See a live audit · no login Audit your own memo

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Audit your own decision

Workflows that fire on decisions like MF Global’s

The same Recognition-Rigor Framework that documents this case audits memos in the same shape — before the outcome forces the lesson.

For CSOs and Heads of Strategic Planning

Strategic memo audit

Audit a strategic memo for cognitive bias and forecast errors in 60 seconds — before the board sees it.

Audit a strategic memo

For VC / PE General Partners

Fund investment thesis audit

Audit a fund investment thesis before the LP raise — catch Narrative Coherence, Reference-Class Blindness, and Optimism Trap.

Audit a fund thesis

For any high-stakes decision, before commitment

Decision pre-mortem

Run a structured pre-mortem before the decision is final — surface failure modes the room cannot see from the inside.

Run a pre-mortem

See all 6 workflows for the full audit-tool surface.

Related cases in Financial Services

Catastrophic failure1998

Long-Term Capital Management

Long-Term Capital Management Collapse

Catastrophic failure2008

American International Group

AIG Credit Default Swap Crisis

Catastrophic failure2021

Archegos Capital / Credit Suisse / Nomura

Archegos Capital Management Collapse

Catastrophic failure2022

Terraform Labs

Terra/LUNA Cryptocurrency Collapse

Lessons learned

A CEO's prior political stature and reputation can create authority bias that suppresses board-level risk oversight.

Concentrated directional bets funded by customer money violate the fundamental trust of brokerage operations.

Anchoring to past success in government bond markets ignores the different risk profile of sovereign credit exposure.