How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureAutomotive2013

Takata Corporation

Takata Airbag Defect and Bankruptcy

Estimated impact: $24B+ in recalls across industry; Takata bankrupt; 27+ deaths

F14

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

Takata airbag inflators used ammonium nitrate propellant that degraded in heat and humidity, causing inflators to explode and spray metal shrapnel. The defect affected 67 million vehicles in the U.S. alone (the largest recall in automotive history). At least 27 deaths and 400+ injuries resulted.

Decision context

Whether to use ammonium nitrate as a cheaper propellant despite internal test data showing instability, and whether to disclose test failures to automaker customers.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

Loss Aversion★ Confirmation BiasCognitive MiseringStatus Quo BiasSelective Perception

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Takata Corporation — 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Echo Chamber
Status Quo Lock

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Confirmation bias: Takata engineers who flagged propellant instability were overruled, and subsequent tests were designed to confirm the product was safe
Loss aversion: switching to a safer propellant would have cost market share to competitors and acknowledged a design flaw
The industry's tier-1 supplier structure meant OEMs relied on Takata's self-certification rather than independent verification

Source: NHTSA Consent Order (2015); DOJ criminal plea agreement (2017); Senate Commerce Committee hearing (Post Mortem)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for Takata Corporation, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Automotive

Catastrophic failure2015

Volkswagen

Volkswagen Dieselgate Emissions Scandal

Catastrophic failure2014

General Motors

GM Ignition Switch Defect Cover-Up

Catastrophic failure2015

Volkswagen AG

Volkswagen Dieselgate Emissions Fraud

Lessons learned

Confirmation bias: Takata engineers who flagged propellant instability were overruled, and subsequent tests were designed to confirm the product was safe

Loss aversion: switching to a safer propellant would have cost market share to competitors and acknowledged a design flaw

The industry's tier-1 supplier structure meant OEMs relied on Takata's self-certification rather than independent verification