How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

FailureAutomotive2009

Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Unintended Acceleration Crisis

Estimated impact: $1.2B DOJ settlement; $3B+ total costs; 89 deaths alleged

F30

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

Toyota recalled 9 million vehicles for unintended acceleration linked to floor mat entrapment and sticky throttle pedals. The company initially blamed drivers, then floor mats, before acknowledging mechanical defects. Congressional investigation revealed Toyota had suppressed internal safety data.

Decision context

Whether to investigate and disclose unintended acceleration complaints transparently or attribute them to driver error, and whether to issue proactive recalls before regulatory pressure.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

Confirmation BiasStatus Quo BiasLoss Aversion★ Selective PerceptionAuthority Bias

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Toyota Motor Corporation — 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Echo Chamber
Status Quo Lock

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Selective perception: Toyota filtered customer complaints through the assumption that drivers were at fault, dismissing systemic signals
Status quo bias in Toyota's "we know best" engineering culture resisted external feedback about product defects
The $1.2B DOJ fine was for misleading investigators, not the defect itself — the cover-up cost more than transparency would have

Source: U.S. DOJ Deferred Prosecution Agreement (2014); House Energy and Commerce Committee investigation (2010) (Post Mortem)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for Toyota Motor Corporation, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Automotive

Catastrophic failure2015

Volkswagen

Volkswagen Dieselgate Emissions Scandal

Catastrophic failure2014

General Motors

GM Ignition Switch Defect Cover-Up

Catastrophic failure2015

Volkswagen AG

Volkswagen Dieselgate Emissions Fraud

Lessons learned

Selective perception: Toyota filtered customer complaints through the assumption that drivers were at fault, dismissing systemic signals

Status quo bias in Toyota's "we know best" engineering culture resisted external feedback about product defects

The $1.2B DOJ fine was for misleading investigators, not the defect itself — the cover-up cost more than transparency would have