How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Which cognitive biases caused The Walt Disney Company's success?

4 bias patterns are documented in this case, led by Loss Aversion. The full set: Loss Aversion, Sunk Cost Fallacy, Status Quo Bias, Overconfidence Bias. Each is mapped to Decision Intel's 22-bias R²F taxonomy with stable IDs and academic citations.

What is Decision Intel's reasoning audit?

Decision Intel runs a 12-node Recognition-Rigor Framework (R²F) pipeline on strategic memos, detecting cognitive biases from a 22-bias canonical taxonomy and producing a Decision Quality Index (DQI) score. The audit produces a hashed, tamper-evident Decision Provenance Record (DPR) suitable for audit-committee review.

All case studies

SuccessEntertainment2017

The Walt Disney Company

Disney+ Direct-to-Consumer Pivot

Estimated impact: $8B+ licensing revenue sacrificed; 164M+ subscribers gained; company transformed

B79

Decision Quality Index (simulated)

Good · 4 biases detected

In 2017, Disney decided to pull its content from Netflix and launch its own streaming service, Disney+. This deliberately cannibalized lucrative licensing revenue ($8B+ from Netflix deals) for uncertain direct-to-consumer returns. Disney+ launched in November 2019 at $6.99/month (undercutting Netflix by 50%) and reached 164 million subscribers by 2022, exceeding its 2024 target by two years. The decision required restructuring the entire company around streaming, including a $71.3B acquisition of 21st Century Fox to secure content.

Decision context

Whether to sacrifice billions in guaranteed licensing revenue from Netflix to build a competing direct-to-consumer streaming platform, risking Disney's most valuable content library on an unproven business model.

Decision anatomy

Monetary stakes

Very high

Dissent suppressed

Time pressure

None

Unanimous consensus

Decision participants

Dissent encouraged

Yes

External advisors

Yes

Iterative process

Yes

Red = risk factor present · Green = protective factor present

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★Loss Aversion

critical

Sunk Cost Fallacy

high

Status Quo Bias

medium

Overconfidence Bias

high

★ Primary driver · Severity estimated from bias type and decision outcome

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

The Walt Disney Company · 4 biases

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 4 detected biases

Reference class base rates

Across all 143 curated case studies in our library:

89%

base failure rate

-0%

partial / mixed

11%

base success rate

■ Failure■ Partial■ Success

Lessons learned

The controlled burn pattern: Disney deliberately destroyed its licensing revenue model to build direct consumer relationships, following the same playbook Apple used with the iPod→iPhone transition.
Loss aversion was managed by setting measurable milestones (subscriber targets) that made the transition quantifiable rather than emotional.
Survivorship bias risk is medium: Disney's unmatched content library (Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar, Disney Animation) gave it advantages most competitors lack.

Source: Disney 10-K SEC filings (2017-2022); Bob Iger "The Ride of a Lifetime" (2019); Bloomberg Businessweek Disney+ investigation (2019) (Annual Report)

Pilot slots available

We caught these patterns in The Walt Disney Company's own record — before the outcome.

See the full bias auditwe ran — no login, no card. Then run the same 60-second audit on your own next memo.

See a live audit · no login Audit your own memo

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Audit your own decision

Workflows that fire on decisions like The Walt Disney Company’s

The same Recognition-Rigor Framework that documents this case audits memos in the same shape — before the outcome forces the lesson.

For CSOs and Heads of Strategic Planning

Strategic memo audit

Audit a strategic memo for cognitive bias and forecast errors in 60 seconds — before the board sees it.

Audit a strategic memo

For any high-stakes decision, before commitment

Decision pre-mortem

Run a structured pre-mortem before the decision is final — surface failure modes the room cannot see from the inside.

Run a pre-mortem

For CSOs and CEOs presenting to a board

Board deck pre-presentation audit

Audit a board deck before the presentation — predict the toughest questions the room will ask.

Audit your board deck

See all 6 workflows for the full audit-tool surface.

Related cases in Entertainment

Exceptional success2007

Apple

Apple iPhone Pivot: Cannibalizing the iPod

Catastrophic failure2010

DePuy Orthopaedics (Johnson & Johnson)

DePuy ASR Hip Implant Recall

Catastrophic failure2014

General Motors

GM Ignition Switch Defect Cover-Up

Exceptional success2013

Adobe

Adobe Creative Cloud SaaS Transition

Lessons learned

The controlled burn pattern: Disney deliberately destroyed its licensing revenue model to build direct consumer relationships, following the same playbook Apple used with the iPod→iPhone transition.

Loss aversion was managed by setting measurable milestones (subscriber targets) that made the transition quantifiable rather than emotional.

Survivorship bias risk is medium: Disney's unmatched content library (Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar, Disney Animation) gave it advantages most competitors lack.