How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureAerospace1988

U.S. Navy

USS Vincennes Iran Air Flight 655 Shoot-Down

Estimated impact: 290 civilian lives; severe diplomatic consequences

F14

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

USS Vincennes shot down Iran Air Flight 655, killing 290 civilians, after misidentifying the commercial Airbus A300 as an attacking F-14 fighter. The Aegis combat system correctly identified the aircraft, but crew members under stress interpreted the data to confirm the threat they expected.

Decision context

Whether to fire on an aircraft in a commercial air corridor that the Aegis system identified as climbing (not descending in attack profile) and on a civilian transponder frequency.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★ Confirmation BiasAvailability HeuristicGroupthinkAuthority BiasFraming Effect

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

U.S. Navy — 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Echo Chamber
Blind Sprint

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Confirmation bias under combat stress: the crew expected an attack and interpreted ambiguous data to confirm that expectation
Availability heuristic: the recent USS Stark attack (1987) made an air attack seem more likely than it was
The Aegis system provided correct data, but human interpretation under stress filtered it through preexisting threat expectations

Source: Fogarty Investigation Report, U.S. DOD (1988); International Court of Justice proceedings (Post Mortem)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for U.S. Navy, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Aerospace

Catastrophic failure2018

Boeing

Boeing 737 MAX MCAS Design Failures

Catastrophic failure1986

NASA

NASA Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster

Catastrophic failure2003

NASA

NASA Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster

Lessons learned

Confirmation bias under combat stress: the crew expected an attack and interpreted ambiguous data to confirm that expectation

Availability heuristic: the recent USS Stark attack (1987) made an air attack seem more likely than it was

The Aegis system provided correct data, but human interpretation under stress filtered it through preexisting threat expectations