How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Which cognitive biases caused Volkswagen AG's collapse?

6 bias patterns are documented in this case, led by Groupthink. The full set: Groupthink, Authority Bias, Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, Overconfidence Bias. Each is mapped to Decision Intel's 22-bias R²F taxonomy with stable IDs and academic citations.

What is Decision Intel's reasoning audit?

Decision Intel runs a 12-node Recognition-Rigor Framework (R²F) pipeline on strategic memos, detecting cognitive biases from a 22-bias canonical taxonomy and producing a Decision Quality Index (DQI) score. The audit produces a hashed, tamper-evident Decision Provenance Record (DPR) suitable for audit-committee review.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureAutomotive2015

Volkswagen AG

Volkswagen Dieselgate Emissions Fraud

Estimated impact: $33B+ in fines and settlements; CEO imprisoned; brand devastation

F12

Decision Quality Index (simulated)

Critical · 6 biases detected, 3 toxic combinations

VW installed defeat devices in 11 million diesel vehicles worldwide that detected emissions tests and reduced NOx output only during testing. Normal driving produced up to 40x the legal limit. The fraud was systematic, spanning multiple model years and brands (VW, Audi, Porsche).

Decision context

Whether to use defeat device software to pass emissions standards rather than investing in genuinely clean diesel technology, when the engineering team determined the cost and performance targets were incompatible with compliance.

Decision anatomy

Monetary stakes

Very high

Dissent suppressed

Yes

Time pressure

Present

Unanimous consensus

Yes

Decision participants

Dissent encouraged

External advisors

Iterative process

Red = risk factor present · Green = protective factor present

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★Groupthink

critical

Authority Bias

high

Framing Effect

medium

Loss Aversion

medium

Overconfidence Bias

high

Halo Effect

medium

★ Primary driver · Severity estimated from bias type and decision outcome

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Volkswagen AG · 6 biases, 3 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 6 detected biases

Toxic combinations

!Echo Chamber

Group members reinforce each other's views, systematically filtering out dissenting signals.

!Yes Committee

Authority bias meets groupthink: the group converges on whatever leadership signals it wants.

!Golden Child

A favored initiative receives uncritical support, with scrutiny reserved for alternatives.

Reference class base rates

Across all 143 curated case studies in our library:

89%

base failure rate

-0%

partial / mixed

11%

base success rate

■ Failure■ Partial■ Success

Lessons learned

Groupthink in VW's hierarchical culture made it impossible for engineers to say "clean diesel at this price point is technically infeasible"
Authority bias from aggressive top-down targets created pressure to cheat rather than report failure
The fraud persisted for years because each participant assumed others had approved it — diffusion of ethical responsibility

Source: U.S. EPA Notice of Violation (2015); DOJ criminal indictment; German Bundestag inquiry (Post Mortem)

Pilot slots available

We caught these patterns in Volkswagen AG's own record — before the outcome.

See the full bias auditwe ran — no login, no card. Then run the same 60-second audit on your own next memo.

See a live audit · no login Audit your own memo

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Audit your own decision

Workflows that fire on decisions like Volkswagen AG’s

The same Recognition-Rigor Framework that documents this case audits memos in the same shape — before the outcome forces the lesson.

For CSOs and Heads of Strategic Planning

Strategic memo audit

Audit a strategic memo for cognitive bias and forecast errors in 60 seconds — before the board sees it.

Audit a strategic memo

For any high-stakes decision, before commitment

Decision pre-mortem

Run a structured pre-mortem before the decision is final — surface failure modes the room cannot see from the inside.

Run a pre-mortem

For CSOs and CEOs presenting to a board

Board deck pre-presentation audit

Audit a board deck before the presentation — predict the toughest questions the room will ask.

Audit your board deck

See all 6 workflows for the full audit-tool surface.

Related cases in Automotive

Catastrophic failure2015

Volkswagen

Volkswagen Dieselgate Emissions Scandal

Catastrophic failure1986

NASA

NASA Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster

Catastrophic failure2016

Insys Therapeutics

Insys Therapeutics Opioid Fraud

Catastrophic failure2001

Enron

Enron Accounting Fraud and Collapse

Toxic combinations

!Echo Chamber

Group members reinforce each other's views, systematically filtering out dissenting signals.

!Yes Committee

Authority bias meets groupthink: the group converges on whatever leadership signals it wants.

!Golden Child

A favored initiative receives uncritical support, with scrutiny reserved for alternatives.

Lessons learned

Groupthink in VW's hierarchical culture made it impossible for engineers to say "clean diesel at this price point is technically infeasible"

Authority bias from aggressive top-down targets created pressure to cheat rather than report failure

The fraud persisted for years because each participant assumed others had approved it — diffusion of ethical responsibility