Twelve specialized agents. Thirty cognitive biases. A ten-pattern interaction model grounded in Kahneman, Klein, and Tetlock. Under sixty seconds.
This is a general-but-detailed walk-through of our methodology. It omits proprietary weights and prompts by design — everything you see here is public-safe, citable, and reproducible against the academic record.
Selectively citing evidence that supports the dominant hypothesis and dismissing evidence that would reverse the call.
Suppressing dissent to maintain group harmony — the memo reads like unanimous consensus where there should be friction.
Senior-voice framing replaces independent judgment. The argument defers to position, not evidence.
Stated certainty far exceeds what the evidence supports. Confidence language without commensurate calibration.
Timelines and costs estimated bottom-up instead of against comparable reference classes. Understated by design.
Preference for the current path dressed up as strategic discipline. Inaction gets the benefit of every doubt.
Severity-weighted count of detected cognitive biases, normalized to document complexity.
Inter-judge variance from the three-judge noise panel. Low variance = stable reasoning.
Share of quantitative claims that verify against grounded search, plus source reliability.
Was a prior submitted, outcomes tracked, dissent present, right committee size?
Inverse of the seven-framework regulatory exposure score from the Verification node.
Pattern match against 146 historical cases. Prior failure signatures drag the score down.
Board-ready. Strong reasoning across the stack.
Mostly solid. Address the flagged biases before the vote.
Mixed. Several reasoning gaps need explicit treatment.
Weak. Rework required before the committee reviews.
Critical. Reset the memo before re-circulating.
Groupthink + authority + off-balance-sheet masking.
Explicit risks, dissent tracked, reference class cited.
Narrative fallacy, founder halo, undefined unit economics.
Three judges converge on the same score. The reasoning holds up — the memo says what it means.
Same memo, same prompt, three different reads. Something is ambiguous — rewrite before the board sees it.
The three-judge jury and inter-judge variance scoring inside the Noise Judge node come directly from this framework.
Recognition-Primed Decision theory grounds the RPD Recognition node — pattern matching against a labeled historical library.
The foundational taxonomy for framing, loss aversion, anchoring, and availability biases detected by the Bias Detective.
Calibration methodology for the outcome flywheel and the Forgotten Questions node — what are you not asking?
Probabilistic decision framing behind the blind-prior capture and per-analysis confidence model.
Source for the 11 strategy-specific biases (entry-price anchor, thesis confirmation, winner’s curse, management halo).
Full data-handling and sub-processor list: /privacy.
Upload takes 60 seconds. The twelve-node pipeline you just read about runs on your document and returns a DQI, flagged biases, toxic combinations, and the questions the memo didn't ask.