How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureAerospace2003

NASA

NASA Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster

Estimated impact: $13B (shuttle program costs); 7 lives

F14

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

The Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated during re-entry, killing all seven crew members. Foam debris had struck the orbiter's wing during launch, but NASA management dismissed requests for on-orbit inspection and classified the foam strike as an accepted risk based on prior missions where foam strikes had not caused catastrophic failure.

Decision context

Whether to request Department of Defense satellite imagery to inspect potential thermal protection system damage on Columbia's wing after foam was observed striking it during launch.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★ GroupthinkStatus Quo BiasAnchoring BiasOverconfidence BiasAuthority Bias

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

NASA — 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Echo Chamber
Status Quo Lock

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Normalizing deviance by accepting prior foam strikes as evidence of safety rather than increasing risk is a hallmark of groupthink in engineering organizations.
Status quo bias in risk assessments means that known problems are reclassified as "accepted risks" rather than addressed.
Anchoring to past mission success in the presence of unresolved anomalies creates an illusion of safety that masks accumulating risk.

Source: Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) Report, Volume I (2003); NASA SP-2003-4101 (NTSB Report)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for NASA, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Aerospace

Catastrophic failure2018

Boeing

Boeing 737 MAX MCAS Design Failures

Catastrophic failure1986

NASA

NASA Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster

Catastrophic failure2009

Air France

Air France Flight 447 Crash

Lessons learned

Normalizing deviance by accepting prior foam strikes as evidence of safety rather than increasing risk is a hallmark of groupthink in engineering organizations.

Status quo bias in risk assessments means that known problems are reclassified as "accepted risks" rather than addressed.

Anchoring to past mission success in the presence of unresolved anomalies creates an illusion of safety that masks accumulating risk.