How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureGovernment2003

U.S. Intelligence Community / CIA

Iraq WMD Intelligence Failure

Estimated impact: $2T+ war costs; 4,500+ U.S. military deaths; hundreds of thousands of Iraqi casualties

F14

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 3 toxic combinations

The U.S. invaded Iraq based on intelligence assessments that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. No WMD were found. The intelligence community relied on a single unreliable source (codenamed "Curveball"), and analysts who challenged the WMD consensus were marginalized.

Decision context

Whether the intelligence community's assessment of Iraqi WMD programs was sufficiently validated to support a decision to go to war, and whether dissenting analyses received adequate consideration.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

Confirmation Bias★ GroupthinkAuthority BiasAvailability HeuristicAnchoring Bias

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

U.S. Intelligence Community / CIA — 5 biases, 3 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Echo Chamber
Yes Committee
Blind Sprint

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Groupthink in intelligence analysis: the consensus that Iraq had WMD became self-reinforcing, and contradictory evidence was dismissed
Authority bias from policymakers created pressure for intelligence to confirm the desired conclusion
The single-source problem: "Curveball" was never directly interviewed by the CIA analysts who relied on his claims

Source: Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, "Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq" (2004); WMD Commission Report (Silberman-Robb, 2005) (Post Mortem)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for U.S. Intelligence Community / CIA, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Government

Catastrophic failure2014

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

VA Health System Wait Time Scandal

Failure2013

US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Healthcare.gov Launch Failure

Partial failure2001

US Department of Defense / Lockheed Martin

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Cost Overruns

Lessons learned

Groupthink in intelligence analysis: the consensus that Iraq had WMD became self-reinforcing, and contradictory evidence was dismissed

Authority bias from policymakers created pressure for intelligence to confirm the desired conclusion

The single-source problem: "Curveball" was never directly interviewed by the CIA analysts who relied on his claims