How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureAerospace1996

ValuJet Airlines

ValuJet Flight 592 Crash

Estimated impact: 110 lives; ValuJet brand destroyed

F14

Decision Quality Index

Critical — 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

ValuJet Flight 592 crashed into the Everglades, killing 110 people, when improperly packaged oxygen generators ignited in the cargo hold. The FAA had documented serious safety concerns about ValuJet's rapid expansion but delayed grounding the airline due to political pressure.

Decision context

Whether the FAA should have grounded ValuJet based on its own inspectors' findings of systemic safety deficiencies before the crash, and whether outsourced maintenance oversight was adequate.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★ Status Quo BiasAuthority BiasCognitive MiseringHindsight BiasLoss Aversion

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

ValuJet Airlines — 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Status Quo Lock
Yes Committee

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Status quo bias in FAA oversight: regulatory action against airlines is culturally difficult because the FAA sees its role as promoting aviation
Outsourced maintenance to lowest-cost providers without adequate oversight created systematic safety gaps
Hindsight: FAA inspectors had documented the exact risks months before the crash, but the system had no mechanism to force action

Source: NTSB Report AAR-97/06, ValuJet Airlines Flight 592 (1997) (NTSB Report)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for ValuJet Airlines, on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Aerospace

Catastrophic failure2018

Boeing

Boeing 737 MAX MCAS Design Failures

Catastrophic failure1986

NASA

NASA Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster

Catastrophic failure2003

NASA

NASA Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster

Lessons learned

Status quo bias in FAA oversight: regulatory action against airlines is culturally difficult because the FAA sees its role as promoting aviation

Outsourced maintenance to lowest-cost providers without adequate oversight created systematic safety gaps

Hindsight: FAA inspectors had documented the exact risks months before the crash, but the system had no mechanism to force action