How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Live demo: Decision Intel on Nokia (2007)

Top-line result

F34/100

Decision Quality Index · Critical

Market dominance (49% share) created an anchoring effect so strong that declining developer engagement and rising iPhone/Android velocity were literally filtered out of board-level reporting. The Vuori & Huy study documents a "fear culture" where middle managers hid bad news — a decision-process failure, not an information failure.

Status Quo BiasOverconfidence BiasGroupthink

Uploaded Document

The excerpt the platform analyzed

“Smartphone OS Strategy Review”

Source:Nokia Strategy Division·2007-06-15

Platform-detected signals

4 red flags in the document

Each flag below was detectable from the document text alone. No outcome data. No hindsight.

01

Symbian market share was declining quarter-over-quarter despite being presented as the dominant platform

Critical · Detectable at decision time

02

Touch-based interfaces were dismissed as a "niche" use case despite the iPhone launch creating an entirely new product category

Critical · Detectable at decision time

03

Developer ecosystem for Symbian was shrinking as third-party developers migrated to emerging platforms

Critical · Detectable at decision time

04

Apple's iPhone launch in January 2007 was creating a new smartphone category that invalidated Nokia's feature-phone assumptions

Critical · Detectable at decision time

Cognitive biases detected

5 biases across the document

★ Status Quo BiasOverconfidence BiasGroupthinkConfirmation BiasLoss Aversion

CEO / Board Question Simulator

Questions the steering committee would ask

Predicted from the document's own signals. In the live product, these are generated from your memo — no two runs produce the same list.

“Is there a chance we're underestimating status quo bias risk on this decision — and what would change our mind if so?”

“Walk me through symbian market share was declining quarter-over-quarter despite being presented as the dominant platform — what's our defensible answer if the board raises it?”

“What would it cost us to do in mid-2007, commission an honest six-month Symbian replacement study involving external developers; by 2008 either adopt Android (Samsung's 2009 path) or sh… before we commit?”

“If this memo were re-run in six months with the outcome revealed, what do we think would embarrass us most?”

Counterfactual

What a bias-adjusted process would have done

Recommendation

In mid-2007, commission an honest six-month Symbian replacement study involving external developers; by 2008 either adopt Android (Samsung's 2009 path) or ship the MeeGo N900 as flagship; build a dedicated app-store team in 2008 instead of 2011; retain Vanjoki rather than alienating him.

Why it would have worked

Nokia's failure was not choosing the wrong OS in 2011 — it was a three-year refusal (2007–2010) to concede that Symbian was architecturally incapable of competing with iOS/Android. The "burning platform" memo came four years too late.

Estimated alternative outcome

Nokia becomes the Samsung of Europe — an Android leader with 15–20% smartphone share by 2013. Avoids Microsoft sale; preserves Finnish headquarters and 20K+ device jobs.

Evidence Timeline

What was visible, and when

Every event below was documentable before the outcome was known. The platform looks for signals like these in live memos.

2007-01-09
Apple announces the iPhone. Nokia holds 49% global mobile market share.
Apple keynote, January 2007
2007-06
Nokia internal strategy review dismisses touch-based interfaces as "niche" and commits to evolving Symbian rather than replacing it.
Vuori & Huy (2016), Nokia Strategy Review documents
2008-09
Symbian Foundation announced — Nokia open-sources Symbian to counter iPhone/Android. Board-level decision to keep Symbian as flagship.
Symbian Foundation press release
2010-09
Stephen Elop (ex-Microsoft) appointed CEO — the first non-Finnish Nokia CEO.
Nokia press release, September 10 2010
2011-02-11
Elop announces Windows Phone partnership; abandons Symbian and the in-house MeeGo platform. Nokia stock drops 14% in one day.
Nokia–Microsoft strategic partnership announcement
2013-09-03
Microsoft announces acquisition of Nokia Devices & Services for €5.4B ($7.2B).
Microsoft press release, September 2013
2014-04-25
Acquisition closes. Nokia smartphone unit fully absorbed; Microsoft writes down $7.6B on the deal in 2015.
Microsoft Q4 2015 10-K

Who Was in the Room

Stakeholders and positions

Who advocated, who dissented, who was overruled, and who stayed silent — the most reliable single signal of decision-process quality.

Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo

Advocate

CEO (2006–2010)

Defended Symbian-centric strategy through critical 2007–2010 window.

Anssi Vanjoki

Dissenter

EVP, Markets

Publicly advocated faster pivot to modern smartphone OS; resigned September 2010 after being passed over for CEO.

Jorma Ollila

Advocate

Chairman (1999–2012)

Former CEO whose Symbian legacy shaped board risk tolerance.

Stephen Elop

Dissenter

CEO (2010–2014)

Chose Windows Phone over Android; decision debated to this day as either last hope or trojan horse for Microsoft acquisition.

Tero Ojanperä

Overruled

EVP, Services & CTO

Advocated services/app-ecosystem strategy internally; sidelined as Symbian defense dominated.

Cross-Case Pattern

Other decisions with the same pattern

Your memo, not Nokia's

Audit your own strategic memo in under 60 seconds.

Same bias framework, same pre-decision-evidence discipline. Drop in your strategic memo or board deck, get the DQI grade, flagged biases, predicted CEO questions, and counterfactual back before your next meeting.

Start free audit See more demos

4 red flags in the document

Each flag below was detectable from the document text alone. No outcome data. No hindsight.

01

Symbian market share was declining quarter-over-quarter despite being presented as the dominant platform

Critical · Detectable at decision time

02

Touch-based interfaces were dismissed as a "niche" use case despite the iPhone launch creating an entirely new product category

Critical · Detectable at decision time

03

Developer ecosystem for Symbian was shrinking as third-party developers migrated to emerging platforms

Critical · Detectable at decision time

04

Apple's iPhone launch in January 2007 was creating a new smartphone category that invalidated Nokia's feature-phone assumptions

Critical · Detectable at decision time

Questions the steering committee would ask

Predicted from the document's own signals. In the live product, these are generated from your memo — no two runs produce the same list.

“Is there a chance we're underestimating status quo bias risk on this decision — and what would change our mind if so?”

“Walk me through symbian market share was declining quarter-over-quarter despite being presented as the dominant platform — what's our defensible answer if the board raises it?”

“If this memo were re-run in six months with the outcome revealed, what do we think would embarrass us most?”

What a bias-adjusted process would have done

Recommendation

Why it would have worked

Estimated alternative outcome

Nokia becomes the Samsung of Europe — an Android leader with 15–20% smartphone share by 2013. Avoids Microsoft sale; preserves Finnish headquarters and 20K+ device jobs.

What was visible, and when

Every event below was documentable before the outcome was known. The platform looks for signals like these in live memos.

2007-01-09

Apple announces the iPhone. Nokia holds 49% global mobile market share.

Apple keynote, January 2007

2007-06

Nokia internal strategy review dismisses touch-based interfaces as "niche" and commits to evolving Symbian rather than replacing it.

Vuori & Huy (2016), Nokia Strategy Review documents

2008-09

Symbian Foundation announced — Nokia open-sources Symbian to counter iPhone/Android. Board-level decision to keep Symbian as flagship.

Symbian Foundation press release

2010-09

Stephen Elop (ex-Microsoft) appointed CEO — the first non-Finnish Nokia CEO.

Nokia press release, September 10 2010

2011-02-11

Elop announces Windows Phone partnership; abandons Symbian and the in-house MeeGo platform. Nokia stock drops 14% in one day.

Nokia–Microsoft strategic partnership announcement

2013-09-03

Microsoft announces acquisition of Nokia Devices & Services for €5.4B ($7.2B).

Microsoft press release, September 2013

2014-04-25

Acquisition closes. Nokia smartphone unit fully absorbed; Microsoft writes down $7.6B on the deal in 2015.

Microsoft Q4 2015 10-K

Stakeholders and positions

Who advocated, who dissented, who was overruled, and who stayed silent — the most reliable single signal of decision-process quality.

Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo

Advocate

CEO (2006–2010)

Defended Symbian-centric strategy through critical 2007–2010 window.

Anssi Vanjoki

Dissenter

EVP, Markets

Publicly advocated faster pivot to modern smartphone OS; resigned September 2010 after being passed over for CEO.

Jorma Ollila

Advocate

Chairman (1999–2012)

Former CEO whose Symbian legacy shaped board risk tolerance.

Stephen Elop

Dissenter

CEO (2010–2014)

Chose Windows Phone over Android; decision debated to this day as either last hope or trojan horse for Microsoft acquisition.

Tero Ojanperä

Overruled

EVP, Services & CTO

Advocated services/app-ecosystem strategy internally; sidelined as Symbian defense dominated.