How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Partial failureTechnology2021

Rivian Automotive

Rivian Production Target Failures

Estimated impact: $55B+ in market cap decline from peak

D44

Decision Quality Index

Poor — 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

Rivian went public at $66B valuation with promises to deliver 1,200 vehicles in 2021. Delivered only 920 despite $0 revenue history. Production targets were consistently missed through 2022-2023.

Decision context

IPO valuation anchored on ambitious production forecasts that assumed manufacturing ramp rates comparable to mature automakers. Supply chain constraints and quality issues were systematically underestimated. Board and investors accepted optimistic timelines without independent manufacturing assessment.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★ Planning FallacyOverconfidence BiasAnchoring BiasOptimism BiasBandwagon Effect

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Rivian Automotive — 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

Optimism Trap
Blind Sprint

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

EV manufacturing ramp rates cannot be benchmarked against software scaling curves
IPO valuations based on production forecasts require independent manufacturing due diligence
Supply chain complexity in automotive requires 2-3x timeline buffers

Source: Rivian SEC Filing S-1 2021; 10-K 2022; Bloomberg production analysis (SEC Filing)

Pilot slots available