How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Which cognitive biases caused Yahoo's collapse?

5 bias patterns are documented in this case, led by Optimism Bias. The full set: Overconfidence Bias, Anchoring Bias, Optimism Bias, Bandwagon Effect, Planning Fallacy. Each is mapped to Decision Intel's 22-bias R²F taxonomy with stable IDs and academic citations.

What is Decision Intel's reasoning audit?

Decision Intel runs a 12-node Recognition-Rigor Framework (R²F) pipeline on strategic memos, detecting cognitive biases from a 22-bias canonical taxonomy and producing a Decision Quality Index (DQI) score. The audit produces a hashed, tamper-evident Decision Provenance Record (DPR) suitable for audit-committee review.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureTechnology2013

Yahoo

Yahoo-Tumblr Acquisition Write-Down

Estimated impact: $1.1B write-down

F14

Decision Quality Index (simulated)

Critical · 5 biases detected, 3 toxic combinations

Yahoo acquired Tumblr for $1.1B under CEO Marissa Mayer, who promised not to "screw it up." Yahoo failed to monetize Tumblr's user base, restricted adult content (alienating core users), and wrote down the acquisition to near zero. Verizon later sold Tumblr for reportedly under $3M.

Decision context

Whether to acquire a social blogging platform with high engagement but minimal revenue, betting on future monetization that would justify a $1.1B price tag.

Decision anatomy

Monetary stakes

Very high

Dissent suppressed

Time pressure

Present

Unanimous consensus

Decision participants

Dissent encouraged

External advisors

Iterative process

Red = risk factor present · Green = protective factor present

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

Overconfidence Bias

high

Anchoring Bias

high

★Optimism Bias

critical

Bandwagon Effect

medium

Planning Fallacy

medium

★ Primary driver · Severity estimated from bias type and decision outcome

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Yahoo · 5 biases, 3 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

!Optimism Trap

Overconfidence and availability bias create a systematically positive outlook that ignores base rates.

!Blind Sprint

Overconfidence combined with planning fallacy creates unstoppable momentum toward failure.

!Winner's Curse

Auction-dynamic anchoring drives bids above intrinsic value; "strategic necessity" and "competitive process" language flag the deal-fever pattern.

Reference class base rates

Across all 143 curated case studies in our library:

89%

base failure rate

-0%

partial / mixed

11%

base success rate

■ Failure■ Partial■ Success

Lessons learned

Optimism bias in acquisition: assuming monetization will follow engagement without a concrete path
Content moderation changes that alienate core users can destroy the very engagement that justified the acquisition
Bandwagon effect: the acquisition was celebrated by tech media as Yahoo's comeback, validating the decision emotionally

Source: Yahoo SEC filing 10-K (2016); Verizon-Tumblr sale announcement (2019) (SEC Filing)

Pilot slots available

We caught these patterns in Yahoo's own record — before the outcome.

See the full bias auditwe ran — no login, no card. Then run the same 60-second audit on your own next memo.

See a live audit · no login Audit your own memo

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Audit your own decision

Workflows that fire on decisions like Yahoo’s

The same Recognition-Rigor Framework that documents this case audits memos in the same shape — before the outcome forces the lesson.

For CSOs and Heads of Strategic Planning

Strategic memo audit

Audit a strategic memo for cognitive bias and forecast errors in 60 seconds — before the board sees it.

Audit a strategic memo

For Heads of Corp Dev and M&A advisors

M&A bias audit

Audit an acquisition thesis for the three named M&A failure patterns: Synergy Mirage, Conglomerate Fallacy, Winner's Curse.

Audit an acquisition thesis

For Heads of Corp Dev and Investment Committee chairs

IC memo pre-vote stress test

Stress-test an investment committee memo before the vote — catch Synergy Mirage, Winner's Curse, and Conglomerate Fallacy.

Audit your IC memo

See all 6 workflows for the full audit-tool surface.

Related cases in Technology

Failure2010

Magic Leap

Magic Leap Mixed Reality Failure

Catastrophic failure2006

Pfizer

Pfizer Torcetrapib Clinical Trial Failure

Partial failure2021

Rivian Automotive

Rivian Production Target Failures

Catastrophic failure2020

Quibi

Quibi Streaming Platform Failure