How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Your data never leaves our SOC 2 certified infrastructure.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model. Decision Intel uses 3 independent judges for noise measurement, a 20×20 bias interaction matrix for compound scoring, 31 domain-specific biases, and an outcome flywheel that gets smarter with every decision.

All case studies

Exceptional successGovernment2020

U.S. Federal Government (HHS/DoD)

Operation Warp Speed: COVID-19 Vaccine Development

Estimated impact: $18B invested; estimated 3M+ lives saved in first year; $2T+ economic value

A88

Decision Quality Index

Excellent — 4 biases detected

Operation Warp Speed compressed a typical 10-15 year vaccine development timeline to under 12 months, delivering multiple FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccines by December 2020. The programme invested $18 billion in parallel manufacturing, clinical trials, and regulatory review — deliberately accepting the financial risk of manufacturing vaccines before approval. The approach explicitly managed planning fallacy by running processes in parallel rather than sequentially, and brought in external advisors from both military logistics and pharmaceutical R&D.

Decision context

Whether to invest billions in parallel vaccine development and manufacturing before knowing which candidates would succeed, risking massive financial loss for the possibility of compressed delivery timelines.

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

Overconfidence Bias★ Planning FallacySunk Cost FallacyAnchoring Bias

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

U.S. Federal Government (HHS/DoD) — 4 biases

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 4 detected biases

Reference class base rates

Across all 146 curated case studies in our library:

90%

base failure rate

10%

base success rate

Lessons learned

Planning fallacy was managed by running development stages in parallel rather than eliminating risk — a fundamentally different approach from typical government procurement.
The outsider lens pattern was critical: military logistics expertise reframed vaccine distribution as a supply chain problem rather than a healthcare problem.
Survivorship bias risk is medium: the programme benefited from mRNA technology that happened to be mature enough for rapid development.

Source: GAO Report GAO-21-319 (2021); NEJM "Operation Warp Speed — Implications for Global Vaccine Development" (2021); Congressional Research Service R46480 (Post Mortem)

Pilot slots available

See what we'd flag in your next strategic memo.

Upload a strategic memo or board deck. Get the same bias audit you just saw for U.S. Federal Government (HHS/DoD), on your own high-stakes call, in under 60 seconds.

Try the Demo — Free Request a Pilot

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Ready to audit your own memo right now? Create a free account →

Related cases in Government

Catastrophic failure2014

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

VA Health System Wait Time Scandal

Failure2013

US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Healthcare.gov Launch Failure

Partial failure2001

US Department of Defense / Lockheed Martin

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Cost Overruns

Lessons learned

Planning fallacy was managed by running development stages in parallel rather than eliminating risk — a fundamentally different approach from typical government procurement.

The outsider lens pattern was critical: military logistics expertise reframed vaccine distribution as a supply chain problem rather than a healthcare problem.

Survivorship bias risk is medium: the programme benefited from mRNA technology that happened to be mature enough for rapid development.