How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Which cognitive biases caused Webvan Group's collapse?

5 bias patterns are documented in this case, led by Planning Fallacy. The full set: Planning Fallacy, Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, Bandwagon Effect, Recency Bias. Each is mapped to Decision Intel's 22-bias R²F taxonomy with stable IDs and academic citations.

What is Decision Intel's reasoning audit?

Decision Intel runs a 12-node Recognition-Rigor Framework (R²F) pipeline on strategic memos, detecting cognitive biases from a 22-bias canonical taxonomy and producing a Decision Quality Index (DQI) score. The audit produces a hashed, tamper-evident Decision Provenance Record (DPR) suitable for audit-committee review.

All case studies

Catastrophic failureRetail2001

Webvan Group

Webvan Online Grocery Delivery Collapse

Estimated impact: $830M in investor losses; 2,000 jobs

F14

Decision Quality Index (simulated)

Critical · 5 biases detected, 2 toxic combinations

Webvan raised $375M in its IPO and spent $1B building automated warehouses in 10 cities before proving the model worked in even one. The company burned through cash building infrastructure for demand that didn't exist, filing for bankruptcy 18 months after going public.

Decision context

Whether to expand to 26 cities simultaneously with custom-built automated warehouses before demonstrating profitable unit economics in the initial market (San Francisco Bay Area).

Decision anatomy

Monetary stakes

Very high

Dissent suppressed

Yes

Time pressure

Present

Unanimous consensus

Yes

Decision participants

Dissent encouraged

External advisors

Iterative process

Red = risk factor present · Green = protective factor present

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★Planning Fallacy

critical

Overconfidence Bias

high

Optimism Bias

medium

Bandwagon Effect

medium

Recency Bias

medium

★ Primary driver · Severity estimated from bias type and decision outcome

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Webvan Group · 5 biases, 2 toxic combinations

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 5 detected biases

Toxic combinations

!Blind Sprint

Overconfidence combined with planning fallacy creates unstoppable momentum toward failure.

!Optimism Trap

Overconfidence and availability bias create a systematically positive outlook that ignores base rates.

Reference class base rates

Across all 143 curated case studies in our library:

89%

base failure rate

-0%

partial / mixed

11%

base success rate

■ Failure■ Partial■ Success

Lessons learned

Planning fallacy: expanding to 26 cities before proving one is the canonical startup over-expansion error
Recency bias from dot-com era: investors and executives assumed internet growth rates applied to physical logistics
The model Webvan tried (online grocery with same-day delivery) eventually worked — 20 years later, with different economics

Source: Webvan SEC filing S-1 (1999); Randall Stross, "eBoys" (2000) (SEC Filing)

Pilot slots available

We caught these patterns in Webvan Group's own record — before the outcome.

See the full bias auditwe ran — no login, no card. Then run the same 60-second audit on your own next memo.

See a live audit · no login Audit your own memo

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Audit your own decision

Workflows that fire on decisions like Webvan Group’s

The same Recognition-Rigor Framework that documents this case audits memos in the same shape — before the outcome forces the lesson.

For CSOs and Heads of Strategic Planning

Strategic memo audit

Audit a strategic memo for cognitive bias and forecast errors in 60 seconds — before the board sees it.

Audit a strategic memo

For any high-stakes decision, before commitment

Decision pre-mortem

Run a structured pre-mortem before the decision is final — surface failure modes the room cannot see from the inside.

Run a pre-mortem

For CSOs and CEOs presenting to a board

Board deck pre-presentation audit

Audit a board deck before the presentation — predict the toughest questions the room will ask.

Audit your board deck

See all 6 workflows for the full audit-tool surface.

Related cases in Retail

Catastrophic failure2018

MoviePass / Helios & Matheson

MoviePass Subscription Collapse

Partial failure2021

Rivian Automotive

Rivian Production Target Failures

Catastrophic failure2016

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Recall

Catastrophic failure2005

Federal Bureau of Investigation

FBI Virtual Case File Project Failure

Lessons learned

Planning fallacy: expanding to 26 cities before proving one is the canonical startup over-expansion error

Recency bias from dot-com era: investors and executives assumed internet growth rates applied to physical logistics

The model Webvan tried (online grocery with same-day delivery) eventually worked — 20 years later, with different economics