How is sensitive data protected?

All documents are encrypted with AES-256-GCM at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit. A GDPR anonymization layer removes PII before any AI processing. Hosted on Vercel + Supabase (both SOC 2 Type II); Decision Intel’s own product-level audit is targeted for Q4 2026.

How long does integration take?

Less than 30 minutes. Upload documents directly, connect via OAuth for Slack, or use our REST API for bulk processing.

How does outcome tracking work?

Outcomes are detected automatically from follow-up documents, Slack messages, and web intelligence. You confirm with one click. Each reported outcome makes your future analyses more accurate.

How is Decision Intel different from ChatGPT or a general AI assistant?

ChatGPT gives one opinion from one model: ungoverned, untraceable, unaudited. Decision Intel is the reasoning audit platform. Most tools audit your data; we audit your reasoning — and catch the fatal blind spots in strategic memos before the committee does. It measures the noise in your reasoning the same way Kahneman did in the insurance underwriter study, simulates an AI boardroom of CEO, CFO, and board personas, runs what-if interventions against a 143-case public reference library, and compounds every confirmed outcome back into a calibrated Decision Quality Index your audit committee can defend. Not a chatbot; a reasoning audit, checkable from memo to outcome.

Which cognitive biases caused Marvel Studios's exceptional outcome?

3 bias patterns are documented in this case, led by Planning Fallacy. The full set: Planning Fallacy, Overconfidence Bias, Anchoring Bias. Each is mapped to Decision Intel's 22-bias R²F taxonomy with stable IDs and academic citations.

What is Decision Intel's reasoning audit?

Decision Intel runs a 12-node Recognition-Rigor Framework (R²F) pipeline on strategic memos, detecting cognitive biases from a 22-bias canonical taxonomy and producing a Decision Quality Index (DQI) score. The audit produces a hashed, tamper-evident Decision Provenance Record (DPR) suitable for audit-committee review.

All case studies

Exceptional successEntertainment2008

Marvel Studios

Marvel Studios Connected Cinematic Universe

Estimated impact: $30B+ cumulative box office; $4B acquisition by Disney; created the franchise universe model

A90

Decision Quality Index (simulated)

Excellent · 3 biases detected

In 2008, Marvel Studios — then independent and without its most popular characters (Spider-Man, X-Men were licensed out) — bet the company on a shared cinematic universe starting with Iron Man. The studio mortgaged its remaining character rights as collateral for a $525 million Merrill Lynch credit facility. Kevin Feige's plan to build interconnected films culminating in team-up events was unprecedented. By 2019, Avengers: Endgame grossed $2.8 billion, and Disney acquired Marvel for $4 billion in 2009.

Decision context

Whether to risk the company's remaining character IP as collateral to self-finance an interconnected film universe — an unproven business model — rather than continue licensing characters to other studios for guaranteed royalties.

Decision anatomy

Monetary stakes

Very high

Dissent suppressed

Time pressure

None

Unanimous consensus

Decision participants

Dissent encouraged

Yes

External advisors

Yes

Iterative process

Yes

Red = risk factor present · Green = protective factor present

Deep hindsight-stripped analysis coming soon. This case is part of our ongoing backfill to reconstruct what the platform would have flagged at decision time. The summary and bias profile below are drawn from primary sources.

Biases present in the decision

★Planning Fallacy

critical

Overconfidence Bias

high

Anchoring Bias

high

★ Primary driver · Severity estimated from bias type and decision outcome

3D Decision Knowledge Graph

Marvel Studios · 3 biases

Drag to rotate · Scroll to zoom · Click to explore

Decision

Critical

High

Medium

Toxic

Bias Intensity Profile

Severity × confidence across 3 detected biases

Reference class base rates

Across all 143 curated case studies in our library:

89%

base failure rate

-0%

partial / mixed

11%

base success rate

■ Failure■ Partial■ Success

Lessons learned

Planning fallacy was present (the original 10-year plan was considered unrealistic) but was managed through iterative releases that validated the model at each step.
Risking character IP as loan collateral was an overconfidence bet that happened to succeed — had Iron Man flopped, Marvel would have lost its remaining characters.
The iterative, phase-based approach to the universe model meant that each success built evidence for the next, larger investment.

Source: Joanna Robinson et al., "MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios" (2023); Marvel Studios/Merrill Lynch credit facility (SEC filing, 2005); Disney-Marvel acquisition 8-K (2009) (Case Study)

Pilot slots available

We caught these patterns in Marvel Studios's own record — before the outcome.

See the full bias auditwe ran — no login, no card. Then run the same 60-second audit on your own next memo.

See a live audit · no login Audit your own memo

Or leave your email, we'll run a strategic memo of your choosing and send the readout within a business day.

Audit your own decision

Workflows that fire on decisions like Marvel Studios’s

The same Recognition-Rigor Framework that documents this case audits memos in the same shape — before the outcome forces the lesson.

For CSOs and Heads of Strategic Planning

Strategic memo audit

Audit a strategic memo for cognitive bias and forecast errors in 60 seconds — before the board sees it.

Audit a strategic memo

For any high-stakes decision, before commitment

Decision pre-mortem

Run a structured pre-mortem before the decision is final — surface failure modes the room cannot see from the inside.

Run a pre-mortem

For CSOs and CEOs presenting to a board

Board deck pre-presentation audit

Audit a board deck before the presentation — predict the toughest questions the room will ask.

Audit your board deck

See all 6 workflows for the full audit-tool surface.

Related cases in Entertainment

Exceptional success2020

U.S. Federal Government (HHS/DoD)

Operation Warp Speed: COVID-19 Vaccine Development

Partial failure2001

US Department of Defense / Lockheed Martin

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Cost Overruns

Partial failure2021

Rivian Automotive

Rivian Production Target Failures

Catastrophic failure2005

Federal Bureau of Investigation

FBI Virtual Case File Project Failure

Lessons learned

Planning fallacy was present (the original 10-year plan was considered unrealistic) but was managed through iterative releases that validated the model at each step.

Risking character IP as loan collateral was an overconfidence bet that happened to succeed — had Iron Man flopped, Marvel would have lost its remaining characters.

The iterative, phase-based approach to the universe model meant that each success built evidence for the next, larger investment.